Administration of Agreements for Durable Material Structures

Main Article Content

Versil Vatta

Abstract

Concrete meets the needs of sustainability in terms of economic, environmental, and social considerations. The material  itself provides a wide range of benefits, including acoustics, vibration,  fire, thermal mass, durability, security,  sustainability,  air tightness,  and  flood  resistance.  For  many  years,  the  vast  majority  of  concrete structures  around  the  world  have  performed  satisfactorily,  but  progress  has  not  been  without  its  challenges. Quality control has deteriorated over time due to the use of poor quality ingredients, uncontrolled use of water in terms of both quality and quantity, poor quality shuttering, poor or no compaction, and inadequate curing. There  is  also  a  decline  in  the  level  of  standard  skill  among  the  Artisans  as  well  as  those  who  supervise  and accept  the  works.  While  older  structures  can  serve  adequately,  newer  constructions  are  showing  signs  of distress within a couple of years of completion. It is past time to pay closer attention to the fundamental issues. At  the  moment,  attention  is primarily  focused  on  environmental  attack,  which  is  significantly  reducing  the lives  of  many  concrete  structures  around  the  world,  in  many  cases  due  to  reinforcement  steel  corrosion. Deterioration  of  recent  concrete  structures  has  been  observed  at  relatively  faster  rates,  and  has  been attributed primarily to cracking.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vatta, V. (2024). Administration of Agreements for Durable Material Structures. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 29(1), 8-12. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/65
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Vatta, V. (2024). Administration of Agreements for Durable Material Structures. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 29(1), 8-12. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/65

References

Halpin, Daniel W. and Ronald W. Woodhead, Construction Management, John Wiley and Sons, 1980.

Hodgetts, R.M., Management: Theory, Process and Practice, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1979.

Kerzner, H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 2nd. Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1984.

Levitt, R.E., R.D. Logcher and N.H. Quaddumi, "Impact of Owner-Engineer Risk Sharing on Design Conservatism," ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, Vol. 110, 1984, pp. 157-167.

Moolin, F.P., Jr., and F.A. McCoy: "Managing the Alaska Pipeline Project," Civil Engineering, November 1981, pp. 51-54.

Neville, “Properties of Concrete,” Addition Wesley Longman Limited, England, 1996.

Neville, A.M., “Concrete Technology,” Longman Scientific and Technical, England, 1987.

NZCIC, “Principles of Best Practice in Procurement in Construction in New Zealand,” The New Zealand Construction Industry Council, January 2006, First Edition.

PMBOK. 1996. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. UpperDarby, PA: Project Management Institute (USA). Project Management Institute StandardsCommittee ed.

AIPM, (Sponsor). 1996. National Competency Standards for Project Management.Sydney: Australian Institute of Project Management:

Karpin DC. 1995. Enterprising Nation: Renewing Australia’s Managers to Meet theChallenges of the Asia-Pacific Century. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service(AGPS).

Beer MR, Eisenstat R, Spectre B. 1990. The Critical Path to Corporate Renewal.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Smith pC. 1976. Behaviour, results and organisational effectiveness: the problem ofcriteria. In: Dunnette MD, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology. NewYork: Wiley:

Boyatzis RE. 1982. The Competent Manager: a model for effective performance. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.