Work Performance Loyalty Approach and Promotion Contribution

Main Article Content

Nurhadi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-4347
A. Kartini Sari Putri
Muh. Asdar
Ilham Safar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-4347
Nasyirah Nurdin
Muhammad Saleh

Abstract

This study is a concept that aims to see the influence of employee loyalty on employee work performance both directly and indirectly by placing job promotion variables as intervening. This study was conducted at PT Prima Karya Manunggal located in Pangkep Regency, South Sulawesi, with a sample size of 85 respondents, all of whom are permanent employees at the company. This study is a quantitative research study using independent variables, dependent variables, and intervening variables, which overall function to measure and explain work performance. Data collected through questionnaires were processed using Smart PLS 4 which was used to see direct and indirect effects with a path analysis approach. The results of this study indicate that the condition of employee loyalty is able to influence work performance at PT Prima Karya Manunggal, this shows that loyalty directly or through job promotion will encourage the creation of employee achievement. Likewise for job promotion, it can be an intervening and explain its relationship with employee work performance. The findings in this study indicate that loyalty is an important capital in maintaining, caring for, and also improving the work performance expected of employees. In addition, the important role of the company in providing conditions that guarantee job promotions is a key that can further improve the performance of each employee.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurhadi, Putri, A. K. S., Asdar, M., Safar, I., Nurdin, N., & Saleh, M. (2024). Work Performance: Loyalty Approach and Promotion Contribution. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 29(4), 312-317. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/136
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Nurhadi, Putri, A. K. S., Asdar, M., Safar, I., Nurdin, N., & Saleh, M. (2024). Work Performance: Loyalty Approach and Promotion Contribution. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 29(4), 312-317. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/136

References

Alfes, K., Shantz, A.D., & Truss, C. (2022). Employee loyalty and organizational commitment: Its impact on work performance. Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0394.12457

Dessler, G. (2020). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. Pearson.

Dessler, G. (2021). Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Pearson.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2020). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of employee engagement in driving organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(3), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2458

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The motivation to work (Vol. 1). Transaction publishers.

Kim, S. H., & Kang, H. J. (2022). Workplace flexibility and employee performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management Review, 32(1), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100782

Kuvaas, B. (2018). Employee loyalty and work performance: A dual impact approach. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), 1249-1268.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12358

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2020). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (2020). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(20)30011-7

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2021). The impact of transactional leadership on job satisfaction and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000166

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2021). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), 123-141.https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000032

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2021). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Sun, L., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2021). High-performance work systems and firm performance: The mediating role of employee experiences and loyalty. Human Resource Management, 59(3), 287-302.https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21988

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.

Wright, P. M., & Kehoe, R. R. (2021). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on organizational performance: A systems perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100756

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.