Acute Study of Personality, Attribution and Location and inner Relation

Main Article Content

Gemrex D. Breva
Asep Aprianto

Abstract

Creativity  as  an  established  research  field  in Psychology  is  no  more  side-lined  as  in  the  first  half  of 20th   century. There   are   many   aspects   observed   in   the   types   of   studies   published   in   the contemporary  journals  on  creativity.  A  review  of  researches  done  in  the  area  of  creativity  is presented under three thematic categories -Personality, Attribution and Environment. The study of personality factors includes the effect of psychopathology, motivation, attention and memory in the creative performance. The study of a creative environment includes the creativity training, studying anti-creative  environments,  technology,  the  role  of  ambiguity  and  the  knowledge  provided.  The study  of  environmental  factors  includes  parenting  styles,  effect  of  technology  on  creativity  of children  in  classrooms,  anti-creative  environments,  tolerance  of  ambiguity  and  creativity  training. The  study  of  Cultural  factors  includes  social,  political,  religious  and  economical  aspects  which influence creativity. The three dimensions of Personality, Attribution, and Environment are critically analysed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Breva, G. D., & Aprianto, A. (2022). Acute Study of Personality, Attribution and Location and inner Relation. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 27(1), 6-9. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/2
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Breva, G. D., & Aprianto, A. (2022). Acute Study of Personality, Attribution and Location and inner Relation. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 27(1), 6-9. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/2

References

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and Creativity at Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academyof Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

Conway, J. C., & Rubin, A. M. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18(4), 443–463.

Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado(pp. 120–140). New York, New York, US: AthertonPress.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and. HarperCollins.

Eisenberg, J. (1999). How Individualism-Collectivism Moderates the Effects of Rewards on Creativity and Innovation: A Comparative Review of Practices in Japan and the US. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8(4), 251–261.

Feist, G. (1999). The influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.

Fryer, M., & Bolingbroke, C. F. (2011). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Two-Volume Set: Online Version. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Cross-Cultural differences in Creativity(2nd ed.). Academic Press.

Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity(pp. 143–169). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.11.Kasof, J. (1995a). Clarification, Refinement, and Extension of the Attributional Approach to Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 8(4), 439–462.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.