Acute Study of Personality, Attribution and Location and inner Relation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Creativity as an established research field in Psychology is no more side-lined as in the first half of 20th century. There are many aspects observed in the types of studies published in the contemporary journals on creativity. A review of researches done in the area of creativity is presented under three thematic categories -Personality, Attribution and Environment. The study of personality factors includes the effect of psychopathology, motivation, attention and memory in the creative performance. The study of a creative environment includes the creativity training, studying anti-creative environments, technology, the role of ambiguity and the knowledge provided. The study of environmental factors includes parenting styles, effect of technology on creativity of children in classrooms, anti-creative environments, tolerance of ambiguity and creativity training. The study of Cultural factors includes social, political, religious and economical aspects which influence creativity. The three dimensions of Personality, Attribution, and Environment are critically analysed.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and Creativity at Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academyof Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
Conway, J. C., & Rubin, A. M. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18(4), 443–463.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado(pp. 120–140). New York, New York, US: AthertonPress.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and. HarperCollins.
Eisenberg, J. (1999). How Individualism-Collectivism Moderates the Effects of Rewards on Creativity and Innovation: A Comparative Review of Practices in Japan and the US. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8(4), 251–261.
Feist, G. (1999). The influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.
Fryer, M., & Bolingbroke, C. F. (2011). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Two-Volume Set: Online Version. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Cross-Cultural differences in Creativity(2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity(pp. 143–169). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.11.Kasof, J. (1995a). Clarification, Refinement, and Extension of the Attributional Approach to Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 8(4), 439–462.