Evaluation of Feasibility and Efficacy between the Critical View of Safety and Infundibula Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy A Single-Centre Experience

Main Article Content

Pérez Yahilina
Rizki Sujeel

Abstract

Laparoscopic  cholecystectomy  (LC)  is  one  of  the  most  commonly  performed procedures  worldwide.  The  critical  view  of  safety  (CVS)  technique  is  a  method  to  standardize  the procedure and prevent bile duct injuries. We compared this technique with the widely used infundibula technique to assess its feasibility and efficacy in patients undergoing LC. A cohort of 224 consecutive patients undergoing LC were randomly divided into two groups: Group  A  with  CVS  technique  and  Group  B  with  infundibula  technique,  having  112  patients  each. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were compared for both groups. Both  groups  had  a  comparable  population  in  terms  of  age,  gender,  and  preoperative parameters.  CVS  group  had  lesser  operative  time  (p-value:  0.045)  and  blood  loss  (p-value:  0.019) compared to the infundibula group. The postoperative complications were similar in both groups. We did not find any bile duct injury in the cohort. The rate of attainability of CVS was 92.8%.CONCLUSION: In  our  observation,  CVS  is  a  feasible  and  more  effective  method  compared  to infundibula technique in LC. Apart from being known for its safety, this study expounds the advantages of implementing the CVS method in LC.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yahilina, P., & Sujeel, R. (2023). Evaluation of Feasibility and Efficacy between the Critical View of Safety and Infundibula Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Experience. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 28(3), 11-14. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/32
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Yahilina, P., & Sujeel, R. (2023). Evaluation of Feasibility and Efficacy between the Critical View of Safety and Infundibula Technique in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Experience. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao, 28(3), 11-14. https://zkdx.ch/journal/zkdx/article/view/32

References

A, Wang N, Tran M. Minimally invasive surgery: early concepts to gold standards. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019;80(9):494-495.

N, Catena F, Memeo R, et al. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):30.

R, Cortina CS, Kornfield H, et al. Bile duct injuries: a contemporary survey of surgeon attitudes and experiences. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(7):3079-3084.

M, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, et al. Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2020;272(1):3-23.

M, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101-125.

SM. A three-step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019;26(4):123-127.

T, Nguyen B, Shih A, Smith B, Hohmann S. Use of laparoscopy in general surgical operations at academic centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):15-20.

M, Hodson J, Ng HJ, et al. Predicting the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and validation of a pre-operative risk score using an objective operative difficulty grading system. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(10):4549-4561.

A, Kapoor VK. Asymptomatic Gallstones (AsGS) -To Treat or Not to? Indian J Surg. 2012 Feb;74(1):4-12.

N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M. Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):322-5.

M, Khan MA, Khan MA, Shah SAM. Critical view of safety faster and safer technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):574-577.

R, Wang YL, Wu XC, et al. Hidden blood loss and the influencing factors after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(1-2):103-108.

T, Eskesen TG, Mesar T, et al. Bile Spillage as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Study of 1,001 Patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(6):1030-1035.

S, Kumar D, Garai D, Khamrui S. Dropped Gallstone-Related Right Subhepatic and Parietal Wall Abscess: A Rare Complication After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. ACG Case Rep J. 2021;8(5):e00579. Published 2021 May 12.

N, Fernandez Alberti J, Panzardi N, Auvieux R, Buero A. Thoracic empyema after gallstone spillage in times of Covid. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;76:221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.181. Epub 2020.

Virupaksha S. Consequences of spilt gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Indian J Surg. 2014;76(2):95-99.

R, Dhal MR, Newme K, Moirangthem T, Boruah MP. A cross sectional study of risk factors for surgical site infections after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in a tertiary care hospital in North East India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(1):339-342.

M, O'Connell E, Rogers AC, Sorensen J, McNamara DA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of factors which reduce the length of stay associated with elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2021;23(2):161-172.

P, Sallinen V, Lampela H, Harju J, Koskenvuo L, Mentula P. The critical view of safety and bile duct injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a photo evaluation study on 1532 patients. HPB (Oxford). 2021;23(12):1824-1829.

P, Rodríguez-Luna MR, Urade T, et al. Intraoperative Time-Out to Promote the Implementation of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:1999.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.